Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
longname
Q738. How did the use of Best Available Monitoring Methods (BAMM) affect emissions?

A738. In order to provide Petroleum and Natural Gas System facilities with time to adjust to the requirements of the GHGRP, EPA made available the optional use of Best Available Monitoring Methods (BAMM) for unique or unusual circumstances. Where a facility used BAMM, it was required to follow emission calculations specified by the EPA, but was allowed to use alternative methods for determining inputs to calculate emissions. These inputs are the values used by reporters to calculate equation outputs or results. Examples of BAMM include monitoring methods used by the facility that do not meet the specifications of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category (40 CFR Part 98, Subpart W), supplier data, engineering calculations, and other company records. It is not immediately apparent how the use of BAMM affected emissions, because facilities used BAMM in different ways and for different parameters depending on their unique or unusual circumstances.


Wiki Markup
{show-to:group=confluence-Users}{center}{_}Footer / References Bar which is Visible to the public{_}{center}{show-to}

Panel

Updated on

Page info
modified-date
modified-date
dateformatdd/MM/YY HH:mm

Wiki Markup
{show-to:group=confluence-Users}
{info}
Source: Brian Cook, 2/1/2013 (W Data release FAQs 2-1-13 3pm (2).doc), revised by M. DeFigueiredo, 2/5/2013, A. McKittrick 9/30/2013

Approval / Publishing History: Version 2

Expiration: none

Relevant Subpart/Component: Subpart W, General
{info}{center}{_}History Panel For Internal Use - Not Visible to the Public{_}{center}{show-to}

This web site is maintained by a contractor to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (RY2021.R.02)