...
Q762.
...
Are subpart
...
N
...
reporters
...
able
...
to
...
use
...
a
...
default
...
assumption
...
of
...
1.0
...
in
...
Equation
...
N-1
...
for
...
determining
...
calcination
...
fraction
...
of
...
carbonate-based
...
raw
...
materials
...
charged
...
to
...
glass
...
melting
...
furnaces?
...
How
...
does
...
this
...
impact
...
monitoring?
...
A762. The rule allows flexibility for reporters to use either (a) the default assumption of 1.0 or (b) methods that use measured data, such us undertaking chemical analysis to determine calcinations and mass fractions, using an x-ray fluorescence test, or other enhanced testing method published by an industry consensus standards organization (e.g., ASTM, ASME, API, etc.) to determine the calcination fraction (Fi) of each carbonate-based raw material charged to glass melting furnaces [98.143(b)(1)(iv),98.146(b)(6)]. If the reporter opts to use the default value of 1.0, then a chemical analysis does not have to be completed for that reporting year.
...
Wiki Markup |
---|
{show-to:group=confluence-Users}{center}{_}Footer / References Bar which is Visible to the public{_}{center}{show-to} |
Panel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Updated on
|
Wiki Markup |
---|
{show-to:group=confluence-Users} {info} Source: A McKitrick and M Litwack - 8/19/2013 Approval / Publishing History: Version 1 Expiration: none Relevant Subparts: Subpart N {info}{center}{_}History Panel For Internal Use - Not Visible to the Public{_}{center}{show-to} |