| longname |
|---|
| Wiki Markup |
{longname} Q334. Is there any flexibility in deciding what configuration type I can use for a unit or group of units? {longname} |
A334.
...
It
...
is
...
possible,
...
and
...
in
...
many
...
cases
...
likely,
...
that
...
a
...
facility
...
may
...
have
...
the
...
option
...
of
...
choosing
...
from
...
a
...
range
...
of
...
configuration
...
types
...
under
...
which
...
to
...
to
...
report
...
emissions.
...
However,
...
it
...
is
...
also
...
possible
...
that
...
only
...
one
...
configuration
...
type
...
would
...
be
...
a
...
valid
...
selection.
...
The
...
reporter
...
should
...
review
...
40
...
CFR
...
98.36
...
to
...
determine
...
what
...
configuration
...
types
...
are
...
appropriate.
...
If
...
more
...
than
...
one
...
configuration
...
is
...
valid
...
for
...
a
...
group
...
of
...
units,
...
the
...
reporter
...
may
...
freely
...
decide
...
which
...
configuration
...
type
...
to
...
use.
...
For
...
example,
...
if
...
a
...
group
...
of
...
units
...
combusts
...
natural
...
gas
...
fed
...
by
...
a
...
common
...
pipe,
...
and
...
all
...
units
...
are
...
smaller
...
than
...
250
...
mmBtu/hr,
...
the
...
reporter
...
could
...
select
...
to
...
report
...
the
...
group
...
of
...
units
...
under
...
the
...
common
...
pipe
...
or
...
aggregation
...
of
...
units
...
configuration
...
types.
...
(See
...
§98.36(c)(1)
...
and
...
§98.36(c)(3).)
...
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
{show-to:group=confluence-Users}{center}{_}Footer / References Bar which is Visible to the public{_}{center}{show-to} |
| Panel | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| } Updated onon
|
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
{show-to:group=confluence-Users}
{info}
Source: This question and answer was derived from a Legacy FAQ
Approval / Publishing History: Version 1
Expiration : none
Relevant Subparts: Subpart C
{info}{center}{_}History Panel For Internal Use - Not Visible to the Public{_}{center}{show-to} |